In determining recently felled two pharmacists against a competitors complained at a discount model, (advantage 24 ") co-wrote and made advertising for it. Both plaintiff and defendant were operators of a local pharmacy. The offending business model, accepted the defendant apothecary recipes and forwarded to one in the Netherlands the local pharmacy they. The drugs were then delivered to the Germans and to the customer, if necessary after consultation, issued. A price advantage was promised as a result these by up to 15 per prescription. As because of 16 AMG foreign mail-order pharmacies need to keep amendment to the German rules for price fixing, was announced by the initiator of this business model in the future to take what had the consequence that the applicant pharmacist took back the lawsuit this distance.

In the context of the then pending decision as to costs, the judge in the case gave the plaintiffs right. In decision was for them not the amendment by the AMG novel instrumental. Contact information is here: Titan Feul Tanks. Already the conduct of the defendant violated article 78, paragraph 2, sentence 2 and 3 and paragraph 3 AMG, 1 ABS. 1 and 4, 3 AMPreisV 78 AMG. The dispensing of medicinal products within the meaning of 78 para 1 sentence 1 No.

1 AMG achievements not in direct shipping from abroad to the end user, but by the defendant in his pharmacy. Because he is significantly involved with its own services in the procurement and delivery of medicines. At the request of the customer, a consultation held in the pharmacy of the defendant. Thus, the order at the Dutch pharmacy differs not much of the case that the customer purchases the medicines from the available defendant. The customers knowledgeable staff faces in the store, on whose advice he can draw and rather took advantage of the is called by telephone to seek advice at the Dutch shop assistant. It is crucial for the judge, not whether the consumer recognizes that seller is the Dutch pharmacy. As far as the participation of third-party sales via a goes beyond mere transport function and the parties so themselves, as they themselves would operate drug trade, not permitted drug shipping lying above. In particular, this applies if, as in this case, the company switched into sales through its advertising evokes the impression, with him you could the drug even in the way of a signing purchase. Other non-binding and free information around the Pharmacy Law, see