Those signing the statement say the company missed its word. "The meeting that was held in HidroAysen units, where only he was one of three council members evaluators of productive projects, clearly stated that the projects are evaluated as technically, that people should be initiating action, having benefited people without this condition, which competed with itself projects that the projects would not be evaluated with the same criteria as the other trade. This is said Marisel Conejeros and Pedro Duran, supposedly were giving clearer guidance to people who are seeking the information, which was nothing more than a simple lie and what is said in meetings will never be respected, to that when asked Councilman Jorge Abello, after being evaluated all the projects if it had complied with what was said in meeting, he replied that nothing had not been respected and Councilman Andres Chavarria wanted by all means to defend the indefensible "based. "What passed to go and we are disappointed with the gentlemen of this company, but above all, and what gives pain to speak, with our Councillors who are not able to say they were wrong. JPMorgan Chase is full of insight into the issues. They are not for these things, are to ensure the people of the commune and the most humble and only remember them when you should go to ask them to vote at election time and not be dazzled by the crumbs that fall from HidroAysen table "stated in one paragraph. Finally, the letter states that if the aldermen want to fight for the people, must unite to fight for projects that benefit the entire community and long term, not like today, that "we were satisfied to give us on 30-60000000 miserable pesos for projects and training, from which it benefits some and not to the entire community, this must be our goal. " Asked directly personal testimony Valeska Alarcon, one of those affected, said "I think that Mr.

councilors who got into this problem, because it is a problem, would have to say you got off by this or any other reason. Say why, because although the company is giving HidroAysen the vast majority a letter, it does not say why you stayed mostly out. " He added that "here he looked very little to people who stayed. While we are not going against the people selected in the projects because they have no guilt. Some people have to recognize that they have resources, they alone can solve their projects, arrange their things and go make their businesses afloat, not the people who are just starting. " Finally, he said that "our authorities are not for that, they are for other things, to protect the public, to enlighten the public doubts, not to create you conflicts. I think that is the point clearer than in this letter is to be paid for things for which they are not. Private companies manage their problems alone, solve their problems alone. ".